Eric -
Just finished watching the final episodes. There is a lot I want to say but at this late hour it is pretty much summed up by my saying Thank you. Thank you for putting yourself out there with your thoughts, concerns, your pure reactions. Your participation put a real face on all the men out there in our position. You took some heat on Twitter but that's ok as it allowed again folks to see the raw issues and emotions. Your children are beautiful and smart and caring and that comes from you and you already know that.
Again for now I leave you eternally grateful for your role as you in this docu-series. Without you it would not and could not have made the impact it did and will for some time to come.
I am posting this same thank you to my blog to publicly thank you.
Thank you and best regards and I hope to continue a conversation with you.
Good night,
Eric Schwartzman.
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
The Dad in Generation Cryo
Monday, December 23, 2013
Follow me on Twitter
Friday, December 20, 2013
Test to Reduce Surgery for Infertile Men
Back when we were trying to conceive even before we decided definitively to use donor insemination we tried IVF with ICSI with the goal of finding any viable sperm of my own. According to research science is close to determining via genetic markers if any sperm found would be viable even before surgery allowing decisions to avoid the knife if the sperm would not viable.
http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/health-25018137
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Advice for Potential Donors
In a comment left in response to a guest post to the New York Times Motherlode blog written by Wendy Kramer of the Donor Sibling Registry and Naomi Cahn titled "Emailing a Sperm Donor: You May Want to Sit Down" the following advice was offered. Wise words any potential donor should take to heart before deciding to donate.
If the donor didn't want to help create a human being (who likely will have questions about his/her origins as most people do), then the donor shouldn't donate. There is no law forcing someone to donate egg or sperm.
If they want to do it out of the goodness of their heart, then out of the goodness of their heart, they should realize that the person created has fundamental rights to know about him/herself.
If the donor is doing it for money to pay for college, he/she should know the person he/she helped create may have reasonable issues with identity decades later. The donor risks his/her "creation" wanting contact or probing decades later with questions about donor's life and history. the little sperm or egg doesn't stay little, but grows up into a human being with human feelings, desires, and questions.
If donor can't handle contributing to these dilemmas, then don't donate recklessly. Again, it's a choice the donor is making voluntarily and should be properly informed about. It's certainly not the fault of the person who was created with the assistance of this donor.
http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/12/16/emailing-a-sperm-donor-you-may-want-to-sit-down/?_r=0
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Recommended Blog Reading
This is Greg's blog and well worth reading. Check out his review of Generation Cryo after watching episode 2.
http://afewpiecemissingfromnormalcy.wordpress.com/2013/12/06/generation-cryo-tv-series/
I am still having trouble posting URL links using the smartphone blogger function. Sorry.
Cheers for the GenCryo Dads
I meant to write after last weeks episode of MTV's Generation Cryo but the week got away from me. And by all right I should be in bed as its midnight here in NYC now.
I will try to write more later but wanted to write about the scenes in each of these last episodes where the dads Jim Bogdan and Eric Jacobson have one on one discussions with their sons.
In Ep 2, at the golf driving range Jesse's dad Jim wants to discuss how Jesse should not worry how he proceeds with helping Bree that Jim is ok and no matter what Jesse is a Bogdan. It was a touching scene showing that no matter what Jim is there for Jesse.
In Ep 3, Jonah Jacobson comes to his dad looking to make sure and ask dad Eric if its ok for him to fly to Oakland to help Bree in her continuing donor search. In the scene Jonah indicates he has no desire to meet the donor today or at all. Eric counsels that once the door is opened there is no going back and evokes the fear that if found the donor may want a bigger role and presence in the lives of the siblings. Again it is a hard scene to watch as everything Eric said I know where he is coming from. But again like Jim in Ep 2, Eric puts the wishes and desires of his son before his own feelings.
Very very impressed how MTV weaves in the comments and thoughts of the parents especially the dads like me.
Ep 3 does not include any footage of the divorced dad of siblings Paige, Molly and Will. In exchanging tweets with Paige this evening I asked her to convey a message to her dad that he did well and that he should be proud. I indicated I hope my two grow up as strong as the three children he raised.
Again kudos to the Generation Cryo dads !!! Thank you gentlemen.
Tuesday, December 03, 2013
DSR Book: Finding Our Families
The book "Finding Our Families" written by Wendy Kramer, founder of the Donor Sibling Registry, comes out today. Am finally ordering my copy.
I will try to post later texts from reviews etc. The reviews have ALL been great.
Sunday, December 01, 2013
NYT Op-Ed: Regulate the Sperm Industry
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/01/opinion/sunday/the-unregulated-sperm-industry.html?emc=edit_tnt_20131201&tntemail0=y
Hopefully the link works as I am publishing this post from a smart phone app.
Friday, November 29, 2013
Acceptance
Seeing the cartoon where the original caption read "He had his doubts from the beginning" I am reminded of a few dads I have spoken to who have had issues using another man's sperm to impregnate their spouses. It is hard to accept at first and sometimes there could be feelings if resentment and jealousy. For some it is akin to infidelity. Not all men have gone into using DI accepting it 100%. Many do and have no issues but for some it has been a fact lingering that lays hidden but can have many ill effects.
I love my kids and was able to process the info of using DI that I don't thing I had to much of an issue but all DI Dads have to accept it to be able to move into the next stages of loving their kids.
Wednesday, November 27, 2013
NYT article re Generation Cryo
The GenetationCryo show made the cover of the NY Times Arts section this week. Below the fold but still very cool.
There was a phrase by the reporter that technology made her and maybe technology can make her whole that @DresdenPlaid took offense at replying that #DonorConceived kids are not Terminators.
I understood Dresden's point. And while the phrasing was cold and impersonal the writer was not trying to say the kids are inhuman. And I am betting that Dresden knew that. He, I believe, was just trying to make clear that this generation, these kids in particular, are the products of this time and continue to grow due to advances in science and have opportunities to help themselves in ways our generation could not have imagined through our connection to and through technology.
I will say I don't think searching for a donor is the same for every donor conceived person and for most the search may not make them "whole" but it would appear as demonstrated here on Generation Cryo that an innate curiosity as to who we are drives our wanting answers that must be acknowledged for those that seek them.
Article link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/25/arts/television/mtvs-generation-cyro-links-families.html?adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1385543849-zUIiUDwf8NSlpsA7vr+Xnw
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Tweeting GenerationCryo
In the past week to ten days I have been responding to numerous postings / tweets regarding the MTV program Generation Cryo. At first the tweets were just ignorant dumb jokes and uncaring comments. They are getting better. Mostly responding re issues and comments regarding parents etc. here are a few of my tweets this morning. Feel free to follow me there as Eric11714.
Saturday, November 23, 2013
The DI Dad in MTV's Generation Cryo
The following post is exactly the same text I posted to the DI Dads Yahoo Group earlier today (with an added link to a UK article about the show. In this post Eric Jacobson discusses his feelings about the show that two of his children Hilit and Jonah appear on as well as his role in the show and its production:
A few weeks back I posted about a new reality show coming up on MTV called Generation Cryo. It's the story about a 18 year old young woman from Reno, NV named Bree that decides she wants to find her sperm donor and along the way via, the Donor Sibling Registry, discovers she has over a dozen half siblings. I saw a sneak peek of the show this past week and I think it is required watching for any DI Dad to get a peak into the lives of our kids when they hit their teenage years.
Link to a UK article about the show:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2511292/New-TV-Generation-Cryo-stars-half-siblings-searching-biological-father.html
Again here is Eric Jacobson's email to me, nothing edited or removed:
On Nov 20, 2013, at 4:20 PM, Eric Jacobson wrote:
Eric (you can post this)
Thanks for your kind words. If I said this was an easy process
making this should I would be a liar. There were many arguements and fights
about if I would even participate: How far would the show go in terms of the
donor? Would MTV make this into another "reality show" like New
Jersey Shore? These were my concerns before we event started the show.
I think I shared
with you and the Donor Dad list serve many years ago that I had to be dragged
kicking and screaming into many of the activities related to our family being a
donor family: Should we tell the kids? Should we tell them about the siblings?
Should we talk to the press? I didn't necessarily want to do any of this - as I
said on the show it was my insecurity. However, the one given that made it
easier for me was the bond and love I have with Jonah and Hilit. With that in
place, I knew that nothing could really go wrong. No matter what they would
always be there for me and I am and will forever be their dad. I think this
came out in the show as well. What may not be there is how protective they are
of me and my feelings. I guess my advise for dads would be to have that love
and nothing else could go wrong.
I had no problems telling Jonah to give his DNA because I know that even if they find the donor or meet him, I am their dad. By the way, both kids said from the beginning they have no interest in meeting the donor if he is found. Still my insecurity comes up a lot and that is what I have to deal with. I know you were concerned about how they refer to the donor as donor father. It is a legitimate concern but I think this issue is so new nobody really knows how to be political correct in how to refer to this guy. I am not sure how any of the kids really feel about this journey. Much of it was pushed upon them by families and then things just happen. I remember at one point, Jonah said as an 18 year old man "he could be someone who donated and probably would not want to have to worry 20 years later that a bunch of kids would show up on his door step." I think he gets it.
Please know that if anyone has questions or issues that I would be
available to discuss them. I know how you feel - been there/done it - and
I know what comes out on the other side. So I dedicate my role on
Generation Cryo to all the other guys out there - may you get comfort from what
I have said.
Eric Jacobson
To: Eric Jacobson
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 11:36 PM
Subject: Re: Generation Cryo
Hey Eric,
Just watched the first episode. Felt giving you my impressions
before I would post anything or blog about it would be appropriate.
First off every feeling you espoused that made it on air I have
felt and related to. No idea if you have met any of the twins other half sibs
parents to know if there is another dad like you. Am curious to see as the
series continues. Was interesting and happy to see the amount of air time
devoted to parent reactions. Appreciated that.
Signing off on the DNA swab test was the right thing but can
understand how hard it must have been. My kids and their sibs are all too young
to be at these kids level of mind set so I am a ways away from seeing what they
want. So the show is a possible roadmap of what may await me.
Am impressed with your honesty and candor. Saying thank you.
Regards
Eric Schwartzman
Thursday, July 18, 2013
Twitter Feedback and Being Engaged in Life
This afternoon I exchanged tweets (via @Eric11714) regarding the DI Dads yahoo discussion group and how it made a difference for one man.
Even though I have not been involved in the group on a daily basis for some time I do take some pride in knowing the group helped this gentlemen.
I sometimes feel guilty for stepping back as I have. My marriage partially failed due to at times not being fully engaged in the marriage as I had been blogging full time through two blogs, this blog, and another a geographically based blog. I guess I still partially blame the time I spent blogging as well as the time on the group. Truth is I had other issues as well. But the effect is I now try to spend more time being dad and engaged with my kids. I don't want the kids feeling ever I wasn't there.
Friday, July 12, 2013
The Donor's Child
Turns out the new half sibling is the donor's own child. Apparently the donor updated his medical / family profile and listed the birth of his own daughter. My kids were excited at the thought of a new half sibling but disappointed when I pointed out that it is unlikely they'd ever meet unless the donor comes forward or tells his own child that he once was a donor.
Interesting and unexpected.
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Another Half Sibling?
Traded emails last night with one of the moms of our two known half siblings. It appears that on the sibling registry maintained by the cryobank there may be a listing for another sibling we were not aware of.
I had not seen this sibling on the Donor Sibling Registry but then again I have not logged in there in a while. Thought there I had set up an auto email when siblings were added.
Interesting if true but why would a parent post on the cryobank registry and not the DSR?
Wild.
Sunday, March 31, 2013
Movie Review: Starbuck - He Fathered 533 Kids...
The following is a post I just left on the Facebook group "Donor Conceived Offspring, Siblings, Parents":
Hello everyone. I am a dad to two children conceived via DI. For years I wrote a blog about just that and occasionally still post there. Last night I went to see the French Canadian film Starbuck From the trailer I expected it to be in movie terms a farce, and point of it were just that.
It is a cute film and while the plot does involve the desire of 142 DC offspring trying to learn Starbuck's identity the film focuses more on the view of Starbuck and his attempts to act as "dad" while not giving up his true identity. I don't want to give away too much of what happens as it is a very sweet movie. Unrealistic perhaps but it does demonstrate that familial bonds develope in a lot of different ways. One scene where Starbuck does make a statement to his "children / offspring" is quite poignant and leads to several succeeding events.
Years ago as a non-biological dad I may have been threatened by the idea of my kids meeting their donor. I don't believe I am anymore but as they are still young it is unclear whether they will have any desire to meet him much less pursue a relationship. In the movie the feelings of the young adult children about their social parent was handled well, if not perhaps quickly, as it was not the point of the story or adding to the basic comedy that was the genre of this film.
We have seen a lot of sperm donor movies over the last few years most with happy scripted endings and this one does not break from the pattern. Most have dealt with the mother ending up, inadvertently with the actual donor. Others have been just as controverted. This ending was satisfying and cute. In the scheme of things it may not add anything to the debates we all have on this topic and our lives but for a couple of hours it is innocent fun (and at points very sweet) and allows us to feel good.
It should be started the movie opens with a totally unneeded scene of Starbuck in the clinic trying to donate. The typical jokes and his "trying" which we did not need to see. Should have been edited out. It is probably the only scene I had an issue with and one I would not let young children see.
As with all movie reviews, and commentary on this topic so close to home, for all of us I expect there will be contrary opinions and I am open to hear them. What is your opinion of this movie and others of what has become a sub-genre all on its own?
Saturday, January 12, 2013
Two DI News Stories: Kansas, Monica Cruz
Kansas
Over the last few weeks I have read a number of articles regarding a case in Kansas where a known donor was used by a lesbian couple where he signed papers giving up his right to the child but now the Kansas courts are requiring him to pay child support.
In short, Kansas law does not allow a same sex partner to adopt the child of their partner. Louis Sternberg's blog summarized the best how the Courts came to their decision and the reason why. It has nothing to do with their position on donor conception:
Sternberg's blog actually states that under Kansas law that if the insemination was done by a licensed physician (it was not here) the donor would have been held harmless.
New York law considers me the natural father to my two DI children as I was married to their mother when they were born. Now that I am not here I am paying child support. No chance for me to get our donor to help out I guess. Lucky guy.
Monica Cruz
I was amused to learn that model Monica Cruz, the actress Penelope Cruz's nearly identical younger sister, decided that she no longer wanted to wait to find the man of her dreams to start a family and turned to donor insemination. There are a lot of comments I can make to this story but many of them would get me in trouble. I wish her and her baby well.
Over the last few weeks I have read a number of articles regarding a case in Kansas where a known donor was used by a lesbian couple where he signed papers giving up his right to the child but now the Kansas courts are requiring him to pay child support.
In short, Kansas law does not allow a same sex partner to adopt the child of their partner. Louis Sternberg's blog summarized the best how the Courts came to their decision and the reason why. It has nothing to do with their position on donor conception:
When [the birth mother] applied for state health insurance for the child, Kansas demanded to know the identity of the father. Kansas law, like New York, allows the state to seek child support on behalf of a custodial parent when that custodial parent is receiving certain state-sponsored financial benefits such as health insurance. Angela de Rocha, a spokeswoman for the Kansas Department for Children and Families said “all individuals who apply for taxpayer-funded benefits through DCF are asked to cooperate with child support enforcement efforts” and that “DCF is required by statute to establish paternity and then pursue child support from the non-custodial parent.”
Sternberg's blog actually states that under Kansas law that if the insemination was done by a licensed physician (it was not here) the donor would have been held harmless.
New York law considers me the natural father to my two DI children as I was married to their mother when they were born. Now that I am not here I am paying child support. No chance for me to get our donor to help out I guess. Lucky guy.
Monica Cruz
I was amused to learn that model Monica Cruz, the actress Penelope Cruz's nearly identical younger sister, decided that she no longer wanted to wait to find the man of her dreams to start a family and turned to donor insemination. There are a lot of comments I can make to this story but many of them would get me in trouble. I wish her and her baby well.
Wednesday, January 02, 2013
2013 - Happy New Year
2012 has come and gone. I only posted here 5 times in 2012. I had hoped I would improve on my 2011 count of 41. But it was not to be. I am sitting here wondering what does that mean? My divorce was finalized early in 2012 so that was not an issue in my writing less as it had been in 2009 and 2010. Overall it must be that the issues of donor conception were not as pressing to my day to day life as they had been in earlier years.
I also have not contributed as much to the Yahoo DI Dads group as I had in prior years. At his point the group is somewhat self supporting. There are a key group of dads there who are great and provide great feedback for those men looking for help.
So why do I come back here? Probably because as my kids get older I expect the questions to increase. They have not yet. My kids are now going on 11 and 9. Their relationships with their half siblings are those of distant cousins. In truth they have been asking to see their female half sibling as it's been a couple of years since they have physically gotten together.
But what about me? What are my needs, my thoughts? I am not sure. When I see news stories on the topic I certainly have defiined opinions, defined positions. I have not been active in the donor conception community in some time.
I still toy with the desire to memorialize all this into a book, updating key posts from over the years, and my thoughts. I expect my activity will increase as the teenage years hit. In the mean time I wanted to ask what topics you as the visiting reader would want addressed that perhaps you have not found if you have surfed through this site. I apologize as the early years of this site did not have topic tagging as the recent years do.
Thank you and Happy 2013 !
I also have not contributed as much to the Yahoo DI Dads group as I had in prior years. At his point the group is somewhat self supporting. There are a key group of dads there who are great and provide great feedback for those men looking for help.
So why do I come back here? Probably because as my kids get older I expect the questions to increase. They have not yet. My kids are now going on 11 and 9. Their relationships with their half siblings are those of distant cousins. In truth they have been asking to see their female half sibling as it's been a couple of years since they have physically gotten together.
But what about me? What are my needs, my thoughts? I am not sure. When I see news stories on the topic I certainly have defiined opinions, defined positions. I have not been active in the donor conception community in some time.
I still toy with the desire to memorialize all this into a book, updating key posts from over the years, and my thoughts. I expect my activity will increase as the teenage years hit. In the mean time I wanted to ask what topics you as the visiting reader would want addressed that perhaps you have not found if you have surfed through this site. I apologize as the early years of this site did not have topic tagging as the recent years do.
Thank you and Happy 2013 !
Saturday, December 22, 2012
Stupid Word Choices...
Somehow I find myself watching The Back-Up Plan with Jennifer Lopez. In this flick she uses a sperm donor and is pregnant with twins. She then meets a great guy and fall in love. By chance he is her sperm donor. Anyhow at one point he states the twins she is carrying are not his. The stupid word choice. She gets scared he wants to walk away and dumps him. Being a romantic comedy you know they eventually get back together.
The truth is every DI Dad has stupidly said these words before the baby was born. There has not been a day after my kids were born that I have thought that. They are my kids. Hadn't been here in a while so figured wanted to check in.
The truth is every DI Dad has stupidly said these words before the baby was born. There has not been a day after my kids were born that I have thought that. They are my kids. Hadn't been here in a while so figured wanted to check in.
Saturday, May 19, 2012
Did We Roll The Genetic Dice ?
On May 14, 2012, The New York Times ran an article titled "In Choosing a Sperm Donor, A Roll of the Genetic Dice". The article details the plight of several families whose children due possibly to a lack of testing or screening developed diseases that possibly are due to the donor's sperm. It is another of the NYT articles on the topic written over the years that I feel couples planning / considering using donor insemination should read before going down this path.
I say it is a must read not so much to scare anyone away from this family building option but moreso that the couple thinks about what questions to ask the cryobank before buying vials of sperm. Those questions may be different for each couple.
My own feelings are that the questions should include the following:
(1) Does the donor bio state what tests were run on the sample?
(2) Does the cryobank publicly list what tests are run on each donor and thesamples taken?(3) When was the donor sperm donated ? and was it donated to this bank directlyor to a previous bank?
The article has opened up a debate on the DI Dads Yahoo Group regarding the veracity of documentation of issues resulting from the lack of testing of donor sperm. For many diseases to manifest themselves it would take both the donor and the mother to carry the traits or genes for the disease. Even if a donor was found to be carrier, who knows if the couple trying to have the children is even aware if the mother might be a carrier as well.
I am not sure how anything can be statistically proven unless more families are encouraged to report live births and/or issues back to their cryobanks or a central registry. People value their privacy and regulation and legislation are seen as impeding on privacy which is another roadblock to effective reporting of issue beyond simple (or not so simple) testing of the donor at the source.
Again I offer the article as another resource for issues that should be discussed. So far the roll of the dice my ex and I took regarding our children has turned out lucky sevens so far. G-d willing that won't change as they grow older.
I say it is a must read not so much to scare anyone away from this family building option but moreso that the couple thinks about what questions to ask the cryobank before buying vials of sperm. Those questions may be different for each couple.
My own feelings are that the questions should include the following:
(1) Does the donor bio state what tests were run on the sample?
(2) Does the cryobank publicly list what tests are run on each donor and thesamples taken?(3) When was the donor sperm donated ? and was it donated to this bank directlyor to a previous bank?
The article has opened up a debate on the DI Dads Yahoo Group regarding the veracity of documentation of issues resulting from the lack of testing of donor sperm. For many diseases to manifest themselves it would take both the donor and the mother to carry the traits or genes for the disease. Even if a donor was found to be carrier, who knows if the couple trying to have the children is even aware if the mother might be a carrier as well.
I am not sure how anything can be statistically proven unless more families are encouraged to report live births and/or issues back to their cryobanks or a central registry. People value their privacy and regulation and legislation are seen as impeding on privacy which is another roadblock to effective reporting of issue beyond simple (or not so simple) testing of the donor at the source.
Again I offer the article as another resource for issues that should be discussed. So far the roll of the dice my ex and I took regarding our children has turned out lucky sevens so far. G-d willing that won't change as they grow older.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















